Arco Cyber News

How MSSPs Deliver Cybersecurity Today (And Why They Need to Adapt)

Written by Team Arco | Nov 5, 2025 10:46:11 AM

The Challenge: Activity Without Assurance

Most Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs) deliver cybersecurity through tools, tickets, and dashboards. They monitor, detect, and report. But while clients see activity, they rarely see assurance.

This is the gap the industry is now being forced to close. Boards, regulators, and insurers no longer want noise — they want proof.

1. Tool-Centric Delivery

Traditional MSSP models are built around managing the customer’s tool stack: firewalls, SIEMs, EDRs, vulnerability scanners, and compliance dashboards.

It’s a familiar formula — alerts, reports, and monthly reviews — but it measures effort, not effectiveness.

MSSPs compete on near-identical technologies, differentiating mainly on service quality or price. Yet despite heavy investment in tools, the core question remains unanswered:

“Are our controls actually working?”

Until that’s clear, confidence is limited — no matter how many tickets are closed.

2. Fragmented Visibility and Point-in-Time Reporting

Even the most advanced service providers struggle to give a joined-up view of cyber health. Tool data is siloed, reporting is manual, and “assurance” often comes from an annual audit that’s out of date before the ink dries.

This fragmentation means:

  • Data is abundant, but insight is scarce
  • Security teams speak one language, boards another
  • Value is judged by activity, not protection

The result? Clients remain uncertain, and MSSPs shoulder the blame for a lack of clarity.

3. High-Touch, Low-Margin Service Models

Manual reporting and ticket-driven engagement make the MSSP business model hard to scale.

Teams spend too much time gathering evidence and not enough time improving outcomes.

Margins shrink. Burnout grows. Clients see diminishing returns.

Without automation or outcome-based reporting, growth means more people, not more value.

4. The Outcome Gap

The question every MSSP now faces:

“Can you prove your service is making clients more secure?”

Most can’t — at least not with confidence.

Their reports measure volume, not progress. Their dashboards track compliance, not resilience.

And their teams are stuck explaining what they did, not what changed.

This is the Outcome Gap — the distance between activity and assurance, effort and evidence.

5. The Shift Toward Assurance-as-a-Service

Forward-thinking MSSPs are breaking that cycle. They’re moving from activity-led delivery to outcome-led assurance.

Instead of just managing tools, they are:

  • Measuring outcomes, using Outcome-Driven Metrics (ODMs) that quantify control effectiveness
  • Aligning to Protection-Level Agreements (PLAs) that track progress towards risk reduction
  • Automating reporting through unified, agentless platforms
  • Delivering evidence, not just effort

The result? A service clients can trust — one that proves value, not just promises it.

Why This Matters

The market is changing fast. Boards want evidence. Regulators want proof.

The MSSPs that survive this shift will be those that move beyond ticket counts to demonstrable, data-driven outcomes.

Cybersecurity is no longer judged by how busy you are.

It’s judged by how secure your clients actually are — and whether you can prove it.

FAQ

Why is it hard for MSSPs to prove value?

Because most reporting is manual, reactive, and focused on activity rather than measurable protection levels.

What does outcome-led assurance mean?

It’s a model that measures real progress — using metrics that show whether controls are effective and risks are reducing over time.

How does Arco help?

Arco enables MSSPs to shift from managing tools to proving outcomes, through a platform-led, service-wrapped model that delivers quantified assurance clients can trust.